Skip to main content

Table 3 Growth performance and nutrient utilization parameters of L. rohita fingerlings fed with experiments diets with PSM for 60 days

From: Effects of substituting groundnut oil cake with Prosopis cineraria seed meal on growth, physio-metabolic, and haemato-biochemical responses of Labeo rohita

1Treatments

2WG (g)

3WG%

4SGR

5FCR

6FER

7PER

8ANPU (%)

9HSI (%)

10VSI (%)

Survival (%)

(% day−1)

Cs

13.42

105.32

1.20

2.41

0.42

1.37

26.03

1.45

3.25

100

PSM5

12.64

99.47

1.15

2.55

0.39

1.30

23.44

1.38

3.55

100

PSM7.5

13.33

105.06

1.20

2.49

0.40

1.33

23.70

1.35

3.82

100

PSM10

13.04

102.45

1.18

2.45

0.41

1.36

25.37

1.33

3.25

100

Contrast analysis

 P values

 Overall

0.211

0.255

0.256

0.304

0.298

0.319

0.282

0.565

0.107

-

 Linear

0.709

0.758

0.772

0.78

0.725

0.872

0.718

0.752

0.725

-

 Quadratic

0.373

0.468

0.46

0.103

0.099

0.094

0.071

0.124

0.201

-

  1. Data expressed as Mean (n = 3); Mean values in the same column with different superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05)
  2. 1CS, 0 g kg−1 PSM (Prosopis cineraria seed meal); PSM5, 50 g kg−1 PSM; PSM7.5, 75 g kg−1 PSM; PSM10, 100 g kg−1 PSM
  3. 2WG, Weight gain
  4. 3WG%, Weight gain percentage
  5. 4SGR, Specific growth rate
  6. 5FCR, Feed conversion ratio
  7. 6FER, Feed efficiency ratio
  8. 7PER, Protein efficiency ratio
  9. 8ANPU, Apparent net protein utilization
  10. 9HSI, Hepato-somatic index
  11. 10VSI, Viscero-somatic index